Score:0
miranda v. arizonabuy from Amazon.com
"Ernesto Miranda was arrested after a crime victim identified him, but police officers questioning him did not inform him of his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, or of his Sixth Amendment right to the assistance of an attorney. While he confessed to the crime, his attorney later argued that his confession should have been excluded from trial. The Supreme Court agreed, deciding that the police had not taken proper steps to inform Miranda of his rights."
Add Your: Image | Comment | Link
Ranked in:
important supreme court cases
Ranked by:
Comments: Login to comment!